Techipedia | Tamar Weinberg - Latest Comments in Why the Fuss about BlogRush?

Re: Why the Fuss about BlogRush?

Michael A — Wed, 05 Dec 2007 01:24:24 -0000

BlogRush doesn't work for me.. it's been almost 2 months..lots of impressions, only 1 click.. not really worth it, IMO..maybe I'll take this out soon

Re: Why the Fuss about BlogRush?

Silveraden — Sat, 03 Nov 2007 09:54:44 -0000

All I can say is, blogrush is giving me around 20 unique per day... I'm sorry to hear about your story.

Re: Why the Fuss about BlogRush?

Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:43:44 -0000

I agree it was just hype and they also used a lot of people in the process. BlogRush accepted a lot of members and got them to promote their service. And how did BlogRush repay them? They deactivated their blogs and removed them from the system.

They did this to over 10,000 people just this weekend.

I can see sites not accepting a submision. But dont accept someones submission, get them to promote your site, and then turn around and screw them over.

You might want to see this article:

http://www.associatedconten... errible_company.html

Re: Why the Fuss about BlogRush?

Simon — Sat, 22 Sep 2007 21:32:11 -0000

AdgridNetwork looks (at a glance) to be similar to link exchanges such as Link-Vault and the DigitalPoint Co-op Network. Correct?

Even if BlogRush wasn't the first of its kind, I think it opens up some interesting possibilites for taking the concept of "related posts" from the single blog level (the wordpress related posts plugin for example), to the blogosphere level. Even though it's a link exchange, focusing it on related blog posts makes sense. There is a real *potential* traffic benefit to the idea....

Having said that, I don't think the blogrush model is the way forward. As people have said, the sidebar gets cluttered all too easily, and widgets can be slow to load. I don't even think the posts will be that well matched (category based never are), and the 10 tier referral system is a bit rediculous. It also means the little guy will get almost zero exposure from what I've seen so far.

As a developer myself, it is still interesting to look at what the blogoshpere is going for right now, and what their criticisms of new technoloy are.

Re: Why the Fuss about BlogRush?

TheMadHat — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:51:18 -0000

@Sueblimely - I made that mistake when the MyBlogLog craze started...one of my posts got dugg and probably lost me 5k visitors before I took it off. Now I wait until the initial buzz has died down and see what came of it. I think it's time to put that one back on.

@HMTKSteve - I've never seen any feedback on adgridnetwork. Have you used it and to what results?

Re: Why the Fuss about BlogRush?

Sueblimely — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 07:58:40 -0000

I did read up about Blogrush and was reasonably interested until I saw the widget. After culling my sidebar of all but the MyBlogLog images and relegating bumpzee and others to links, I was not about to add any more slow loading elements, especially a blog roll. I tend to join everything to see what it is like but I think I have had about enough of this kind of thing. I do not have the time to give them all the attention they need to make them worthwhile.

Re: Why the Fuss about BlogRush?

Colin — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 05:52:05 -0000

Hi Tamar,

Something else to fill the sidebars with which is not really appealing anyway :)

There are far better ways of generating traffic, and good SEO and keywords play a main part in this as well as content and quality.

This is just another 5 minute wonder which is likely to have no impact on your blogs whatsoever.

Re: Why the Fuss about BlogRush?

HMTKSteve — Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:12:18 -0000

All I can say is: http://www.adgridwork.com

Re: Why the Fuss about BlogRush?

tamar — Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:34:03 -0000

Jason: I remember when you removed MBL for that reason. That slow page load issue was huge back then.

In any event, I can't believe people are still talking about it. ;)

Re: Why the Fuss about BlogRush?

Webomatica — Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:22:39 -0000

Sidebars can easily become cluttered. I'm thinking the costs must be considered - confusing readers, slowing page loads, and even distracting readers from the content.

Re: Why the Fuss about BlogRush?

ios12android9 — Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:14:39 -0000

As Alister has said this is another AmWay-like company.

Re: Why the Fuss about BlogRush?

Scott Hendison — Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:05:06 -0000

re: no widget showing on your advertisers site

I noticed this on day 1, and posted about people gaming the system after I could not find ANYONE from my own site that was using the widget...

But, the next morning I found a legitimate explanation - since my chosen category was technology, the Blog rush inventory was still very low, and I was showing their static placed RSS feeds.

I do expect that once inventory increases in my category, I will only be showing ads for other users, assuming I don't just take your advice and declutter ;)

re: why are all the posts negative now?

Perhaps people's expectations were just ridiculously high? Who really believed text ads would drive a ton of traffic? I only got it so I could to test it out, and it's not horrible... Any free visitors that want to read a post of mine are welcome any time.

Re: Why the Fuss about BlogRush?

Alister Cameron // Blogologist — Wed, 19 Sep 2007 01:23:24 -0000

Tamar,

What happened?!!!

In a matter of a day all of a sudden all the blog posts about BR are negative!

Have you noticed that?

But I think it's wise. I mean, we're all pretty jaded about "big launches" and this had better perform.

So thanks for the wisdom :)

-Alister

Re: Why the Fuss about BlogRush?

tamar — Tue, 18 Sep 2007 23:55:39 -0000

"Ive clicked through all five links on some BlogRush widgets only to find that NONE of the target sites have the widget."

Wow, that's kind of ... awesome.

Re: Why the Fuss about BlogRush?

Urbanist — Tue, 18 Sep 2007 23:48:41 -0000

I've clicked through all five links on some BlogRush widgets only to find that NONE of the target sites have the widget, so they are clearly scamming the system somehow. Add to that the fact that a lot of the links are semi spammy/scammy and you've got a widget likely to vanish as fast as it appeared. Get Romlet and MBL instead and be done with it, IMHO

Re: Why the Fuss about BlogRush?

Mike Geeks.com — Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:58:46 -0000

It's a 'wait and see' game with this one....thank you for the insight!

Re: Why the Fuss about BlogRush?

TDavid — Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:07:03 -0000

It gets worse. Blogrush was supposed to launch on Friday and stats would appear within 24-48 hours. Here we are on Tuesday the 18th, over twice that amount of time and only excuses from Reese and bogus error messages showing up in place of links (see signature link for screenshot and details).

Bloggers need to tread carefully with this one, if they bother at all.

Re: Why the Fuss about BlogRush?

modano — Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:38:12 -0000

I agree with Jon Kelly,
Sad to see how it went down on sphinn, Chasing referrals for a hype instead of focusing on better things, as said quality content and proper marketing...

its just another link exchange wrapped into the hip web2.0 word "widget".

Re: Why the Fuss about BlogRush?

TheMadHat — Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:29:34 -0000

Amen to that. For one I've found readers don't do much in the way of the sidebar unless it's really in your face, which is annoying on the other hand. Also I prefer to keep my design clean and not clutter up everything with a bunch of garbage. There are other similar widgets out there without the popularity that blogrush has right now so we'll see what happens to it. Not exactly worth the excitement level in my opinion.

Re: Why the Fuss about BlogRush?

Matt Jones — Tue, 18 Sep 2007 09:45:26 -0000

There is only 1 way to find out if it works. The way I see it, for some bloggers (like yourself) where the widget may not suit the heavily RSS based readership or appearance of the blog, for them them it is more beneficial to question the service to differentiate themselves. As for me, I know I can build a downline and there is only 1 way to find out if it will bring traffic.

Re: Why the Fuss about BlogRush?

Sebastian — Tue, 18 Sep 2007 07:45:46 -0000

You're spot on. And Bob too. Also the "niches" to choose from are way to broad. Niche blogs won't get any traffic but provide free advertising for the trafficked mainstream blogs. From my tests I got *one* referral from literally tons of impressions, and this was from a weightwatchers blog, which is certainly able to funnel targeted traffic to a niche SEO/Web-development blog like mine. Since every dog and his fleas have the widget on the sidebar, I checked each blog I've visited for my links, not so surprising to no avail.

Re: Why the Fuss about BlogRush?

Bob Gladstein — Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:45:58 -0000

I suggested in one of the many threads about it at Sphinn that it was yet another pyramid scheme. The only response I got it that it's not illegal, but of course that wasn't my point. If it's at all useful, it's only useful to early adopters, and the main benefit of having it is going to come from getting people into your network, not writing posts that look interesting.

Re: Why the Fuss about BlogRush?

Jon Kelly — Mon, 17 Sep 2007 22:57:50 -0000

It was especially sad to see everyone begging for a downline (isn't that the technical term?) on Sphinn.

Re: Why the Fuss about BlogRush?

Jon Kelly — Mon, 17 Sep 2007 22:55:50 -0000

Hey Tamar, I'm with you on this. Having just moved from Utah (the home base of about 75% of all pyramid schemes), all the BlogRush gush just made me ill. I think the biggest reason not to do it is similar to why people shouldn't install AdSense -- it degrades the quality of your blog.

Re: Why the Fuss about BlogRush?

iantrepreneur — Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:51:56 -0000

that is true - I do not really pay too much attention to the sidebars - that is another good point - we tend to become immune to banner like situations