-
Website
http://www.techipedia.com/ -
Original page
http://www.techipedia.com/2008/weezer-viral-marketing/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
coriwestphal
2 comments · 1 points
-
faryl
2 comments · 5 points
-
dotlizard
1 comment · 5 points
-
webomatica
3 comments · 5 points
-
Bobby Kircher
1 comment · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
That's all well and good, but the difference here is tremendous. Weezer actually brought in the actors from all popular memes and put them in one room to record that video. They didn't just mash up a bunch of internet meme videos. They made it their own and personalized it with their own song. That's a lot more original than taking the best videos and remixing it as your own, wouldn't you say?
Here's the link to BNL's video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FoFMRXlNJ6Y
It was the first thing I thought about when I read about Weezer's video. The difference is that BNL had people do it like they naturally do their videos. And Weezer had the people in their video.
If that makes any sense. Same formula, different execution. Kinda.
You've got a great enthusiasm for your topic, which is why I decided to review your blog on DoYouDiggIt.com. Please stop in and take a look!
http://www.doyoudiggit.com/technology/tips-for-...
You'll find a Digg button at the bottom (which I'm sure a tech geek like you will have no trouble using:) ). Feel free to give yoruself a Digg!
To the extent that Weezer and Universal don't have embedd codes on the music video, no link to another video, and delete the content when other folks post it (ie the link above is now dead)...I think they still have some learning to do.
Great post, however.
Take care,
Nathan
I think they should realize that they got social media right until they removed embedding.
To me, this video feels more like a celebration of internet memes, the people behind them, and the impact social media & social media marketing has had on our lives, rather than an explicit attempt to leverage its success and market a band.
I don't think it's <cite>a brilliant marketing move</cite> and I don't think assumptions about its marketing performance from <cite>a social media perspective</cite> are necessarily acurate. However, simply saying 'you're wrong, I'm right' isn't constructive and it's not what I'm trying to do.
What I do think, is that this video raises important questions -- like whether or not we know we're being marketed to; and how successful a marketing campaign can be if it doesn't tie in to the product or branding or encourage us to take some form of action.
I guess what I'm trying to say is just because <cite>a bird looks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck...</cite> it isn't always a duck.
You say PO-tay-to, I say PO-TOT-o. It's a matter of opinion and that's what this piece was trying to convey. I personally found that it was brilliant from a social media perspective (my own). You're entitled to disagree. You're allowed :)
And perhaps their intentions weren't marketing at all, but I still personally think it was very-well thought out and worked in the marketing sphere.
Personally, I also feel that the best products market themselves. In other words, this video wasn't a marketing campaign, but it worked well as one after social media aficionados and marketers viewed this as such.
Never mind them, the music industry always tries to go a step further into selling less cd's.
All in all, though, it kind of sucks. Hopefully since they seemed to have been receptive to YouTube videos in the past, maybe they'll be receptive to my little video. After all, my blog post does look silly now that it lacks the video I spoke about. :(
Don't look at me, I have weezer's pat on twitter. :-D