-
Website
http://www.techipedia.com/ -
Original page
http://www.techipedia.com/2008/twitter-vs-plurk/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
coriwestphal
2 comments · 1 points
-
faryl
2 comments · 5 points
-
dotlizard
1 comment · 5 points
-
webomatica
3 comments · 5 points
-
Bobby Kircher
1 comment · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Oh, and... FriendFeed. ;-)
I am starting to use Plurk more with the mobile interface, though it isn't 100%. I use my Brightkite account and post pictures to my Twitter stream, but I see Plurk more as a leisure tool and Twitter as more of a professional tool.
I think this is great advice for all social media sites. Use each site for a specific purpose (which will have its inevitable crossover, of course). That also helps a little with avoiding business contacts being subjected to your messy weekend photos!
I think that the Plurk power is coming through the Cliques feature in Plurk. http://www.plurk.com/user/theGypsy fore example uses cliques to collectively create a more selective audience to hold a dialogue with. I think that the conversation threads in Plurk hold a bit more dialogue worth..with a bunch of nonsense mixed in. It is frustrating, because it seems that the nonsense plurks get more itneraction that serious topics... Maybe it's the interface, maybe it's the visual nature of the the plurk beast...
There will be some who still use it to Plurk about each event during their day, but there will also be those that use it just like Twitter, for business and networking efforts, but now they'll have the added benefit of a dedicated replies page, making it easier to manage the conversation.
Again, great post.
Don't get me wrong, I still like Twitter, but its just gotten so frustrating to have to use summize, or any of the other apps just to have a conversation. That defeats the whole purpose, I think.
I have also been using ping.fm A LOT to post, but at the end of the day, I feel unfulfilled by the experience becuase I cant track the responses or the conversations. Which sux!
I have yet to get the hang of plurking and really don't have time for both. Twitter seems to remain the more professional sort of hangout so unless that changes I'll probably need to leave Plurk to your *Plurkrastinators*
Great term coinage there!
Plurk = 2 dimensions
Plurk with IRC like IM = 3 dimensions
also needed are historical search and data mining
(and I am not joking on this) someday the cultural anthropologists will be analyzing social behavior and without a historical mine of ASCII remarks they will falter.
Great post!
I've written a few articles on Friendfeed -- I don't really lump it with Plurk so much.
See:
How Spying On Your Friends Causes Reevaluation of Endorsed Content
and
How Friendfeed Can Teach You About Your Friends
I liked Plurk so much I made a plugin for wordpress and turned my personal blog into a plurk powered micro-blog.
:)
It's just good for the site owners to make money... rest in my opinion if everyone uses one of them only, like myspace it will be better... you find your friends easier!
It's called social media marketing, not MySpace marketing.
Plus, MySpace is not even really relevant to this article. It's a social site, but we're talking about microblogging now. I hope your SEO consulting firm recognizes the importance of that too.
I think this is great advice for all social media sites. Use each site for a specific purpose (which will have its inevitable crossover, of course). That also helps a little with avoiding business contacts being subjected to your messy weekend photos!
chat
Anyway, does using Twitter make you a twit?
sohbet
Great term coinage there!
love the commenting system, and emoticon also get karma more higher then i will get more emoticon and became NIRVANA..Yippie..
[Tamar's note: Thanks Sohbetci--but I had to remove the spam links you added to the end of your comment.]
[editor's note: link removed. It looks like spam. Surely you weren't trying to spam my blog, were you?]